Vol.34. November 28. 2025
What is happening in East Asian Maritime Security? The Research Institute for Peace and Security (RIPS) publishes the biweekly newsletter, the information on maritime security relevant to East Asia and Japan's territory. |
Monthly Column
Reflections on Prime Minister Takaichi's Remarks
on Existence-Threatening Situations
Nobukatsu Kanahara
Executive Director, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
Professor, Reitaku University
1. What is the matter?
In November 2025, Prime Minister Takaichi stated in the Japanese Diet that a military blockade of Taiwan in the event of a Taiwan contingency could constitute an existence-threatening situation. This means that Japan could assist US forces with military forces as use of collective self-defense under UN Charter.
China reacted strongly. It recommended tourists not to visit Japan and students not to study in Japan, citing the deteriorating safety in Japan. It is not a fact, but it is a strong expression of displeasure of the Chinese government.
But, it's nothing but a case of “what's the big deal now?”
According to Article 6 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty, revised in 1960, U.S. forces can use bases in Japan to defend Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines. This is the so-called “Far East Clause.” It clearly reflects the early postwar U.S. policy of preventing former Japanese and U.S. territories from falling into the hands of Stalin and Mao Zedong.
Subsequently, the Japanese government established a legal framework allowing the Self-Defense Forces to support U.S. forces. Logistical support for US forces in the event of a “significant influence situation”, meaning a contingency that could affect Japan was made possible by Prime Minister Obuchi Keizo in 1999.
And use of force for assisting US forces in the event of “crisis of national existence”, meaning a contingency that could pose existential threat to Japan, was also made possible by Prime Minister Abe Shinzo in 2015.
Nonetheless, China did not hide its anger, because fundamentally, the positions of China and the U.S.-Japan alliance on Taiwan are entirely different. In 1972, Dr. Kissinger, accompanying President Nixon on his historic visit to China, drafted the Shanghai Communiqué. The Shanghai Communiqué clearly stated the U.S. position: “Since the Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait maintain that there is only one China, the United States does not challenge this, but hopes the Taiwan issue will be resolved peacefully.”
This means that while there are two Chinas—the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China—both insist there is only one China, so the U.S. does not challenge this. It also explicitly added that the Taiwan issue should be resolved without the use of force. Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai said once to then Prime Minister of Japan, Tanaka Kakuei that Kissinger was a genius, commending his drafting talent.
Japan shares this position. In the 1972 Japan-China Joint Declaration, Japan stated that while it accepted the Cairo Declaration of 1943 through the Potsdam Declaration of 1945, it understood and respected the Cairo Declaration's stipulation that Taiwan be returned to China. The underlying intent was that Japan had renounced Taiwan later in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and thus was not in a position to say to whom Taiwan belonged after that.
2. Background of Japan-China and US-China normalization
China had to accept the drafting on Taiwan by Dr. Kissinger in the Shanghai Communique and in Japan-China joint communique in 1972, because the Soviet tanks were headed to Beijing.
After Stalin's death in 1953, Mao Zedong opposed Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev's policy of "thaw" with the West. The Sino-Soviet split began. Mao resolved to pursue nation building based upon his own communism without Russian support. The "Great Leap Forward" (1958-59) ended in catastrophic failure, causing tens of millions to starve to death. Disliking being elevated to a ceremonial role, Mao launched the "Cultural Revolution" (1966-76), resulting in millions more deaths.
Mao pursued aggressive foreign wars. He repeatedly expanded its territory or its sphere of influence through interventions like the Korean War (1950), the annexation of Tibet (1950), and the invasion of India (1962). After the clash with Russia at Zhenbaodao, or Damansky Island (1969), six Russian divisions advanced south into Mongolia. Struck by fear, China jumped toward normalizing relations with the United States and Japan. At that time, China urged Japan to jointly counter Soviet hegemony, but Japan refused.
Americans had also a reason to hasten the normalization with China. The Nixon administration was exhausted by the Vietnam War. President Johnson's large troop surge backfired domestically, and the civil rights movement and anti-Vietnam War protests were gaining momentum. Seeking to exploit the Sino-Soviet split, the U.S. aimed to pull China away from the Soviet Union and to end the Vietnam War. This was the Kissinger's strategy and it succeeded, leading to the end of the Vietnam War and the era of the U.S.-Soviet détente began.
Toward the end of the last century, two big changes happened in the security situation in East Asia. First is Taiwan's Democratization (1994) and the Missile Crisis caused by China(1995–1996). Under Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui, Taiwan's constitution was amended. Free elections were held in 1996. Lee Teng-hui became the first democratically elected president in history.
Sentiments among Taiwanese (native Taiwanese), suppressed under long Kuomintang dictatorship, erupted. A new Taiwanese civic identity emerged. A startled China fired missiles off the coast of Taiwan (1995-1996). After the urgent dispatch of two U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups, the situation calmed. However, this marked the shift of China toward an "A2AD (Anti-
Access/Area Denial)" strategy. The beginning of a major military expansion started.
Second is the China's major military expansion thus started. Even after the Western economies suffered a major blow from the Lehman Shock (2008), China's economy remained robust. It surpassed Japan's economy (2010), matched the EU, and began chasing the US.
China invests annually massive military spending (currently ¥36 trillion) in a major military expansion effort. Its fleet approaches 400 major vessels (U.S.: 300, Japan: 50). It possesses 600 nuclear warheads. Matching the U.S. deployed warhead count of 1,500 is only a matter of time. President Xi Jinping ordered preparations for an invasion of Taiwan to be completed by 2027.
Another complicating factor is the President Xi Jinping's retro-style governance. President Xi Jinping grew up as a Red Guard during the Cultural Revolution era. He represents a generation that was completely deprived of any opportunities of education. He harbors a sense of crisis that the liberalized economy following Deng Xiaoping threatens the Communist Party's dictatorship.
His leadership style is a mini-Mao, and he is hostile to free thought and free market. He pursues ideological control, strong patriotism, a self-sufficient economy, and the absolute supremacy of Communist Party rule. Consequently, the real estate bubble has collapsed. Youth unemployment rates have risen. Low growth has become the "new normal." The illusion of "East rising, West declining" after the Lehman Shock is fading. But he continues to hold power in his own hands. His style is the true one-man dictatorship like Mao or Stalin.
Seeing this new situation over Taiwan Strait, the US hardened its position. The first Trump administration declared the era of great power competition between the US and China, deeming the engagement policy a failure. Vice President Pence, Secretary of State Pompeo, and Deputy National Security Advisor Pottinger made a speech to announce this. Relations with China became tense.
3. How to avoid Taiwan contingency?
Taiwan contingency must be avoided at any cost. Deterrence of Taiwan contingency is much less expensive than a real war.
Economic impact of Taiwan contingency is enormous. First is the impact on the financial sector. Massive amounts of short-term dollar risk capital flowing into Asia will be rapidly withdrawn. Asian currencies like the yen, won, and Taiwan dollar will plummet. Asian stock markets also will crash. To take an example, daily trading volume on the Tokyo Stock Exchange is about ¥5 trillion. Over half is dollar-denominated capital. This will evaporate from Tokyo market.
Second is the impact on the shipping industry. The East China Sea and the South China Sea become combat zones, in addition to the waters around a blockade of Taiwan. If Lloyd's refuses to provide marine insurance, Tokio Marine & Nichido will also find it difficult to offer coverage. Japan's economy relies on a fleet of 4,000 merchant ships. Nearly all energy and two-thirds of food are sourced from overseas. Japan's sea lanes are forced to take significantly longer, more circuitous routes. Shipping costs rise.
Third and the hardest is the disruption of trade with China and evacuation of Japanese nationals. Trade with China, including rare earths, would cease entirely. Transactions with China would only be possible via third countries. Investments in China would freeze, with recovery impossible. Not only SMEs but also large corporations would face severe hardship. Japanese businesses men in China would repatriate via third countries.
Forth and not the last is the disruption of Taiwanese semiconductors. Imports of semiconductors from Taiwan will cease. Furthermore, Taiwan is blockaded, making repatriation difficult after an emergency occurs.
Taiwan contingency must be avoided. For that purpose, the West led by Japan, US and Australia should make China understand that Taiwan invasion is too costly.
In fact, Taiwan is not an island easy to conquer. It is roughly the size of Kyushu. It is a fully democratic nation of 23 million free people that abhors dictatorship. Taiwan became a part of Japan in 1895. Ninety percent of its native inhabitants (Taiwanese) share no history with the People's Republic of China since 1949 nor even the Xinhai Revolution and the Republic of China since 1911. Peaceful unification is impossible.
Attempting military unification would require crossing the Taiwan Strait to conquer Taiwan after cyberattacks, missile strikes, and naval bombardment. Taiwan's military has 170,000 regular standing troops. Destroying this force would necessitate landing over 300,000 troops. Taiwan lacks large beaches like Normandy, making amphibious invasions extremely difficult.
Currently, the Xi Jinping administration aims to exploit internal divisions in Taiwan using the Kuomintang. China's campaign emphasizes two points: 1) President Lai Ching-te's Democratic Progressive Party is fomenting independence and provoking war with China, and 2) the U.S. military will not come to Taiwan's help. Additionally, China frequently conducts heavily military exercises around Taiwan to intimidate.
Taiwanese are realists. They are satisfied with maintaining de facto independence. While they oppose the KMT’s pro-China policy, they also avoid the DPP's radicalization on the independence issue.
4. Japan’s strategy to keep peace and stability over Taiwan Strait
Prime Minister Takaichi is determined to maintain the "Strategic and Mutually Beneficial Relationship" with China. This is the brand strategy of Prime Minister Abe. Prime Minister Abe's "Strategic and Mutually Beneficial Partnership" restored Sino-Japanese relations that had deteriorated due to Prime Minister Koizumi's repeated visits to Yasukuni Shrine.
This approach recognizes the strategic importance of bilateral relations, with both sides striving to stabilize the relationship. Differences in values and other positions are set aside to maintain the status quo, including peace in the Taiwan Strait and deepening economic ties.
At the same time, Japan will, together with US, to deter China to go to a Taiwan contingency, but in a quiet manner. Strengthening the Japan-U.S. Alliance is the corner stone for that. In the US MAGA people are less and less enthusiastic to be entangled in foreign conflicts. The less the US is committed, the more Japan shall be committed to the peace and stability in Asia. That is the only way to make US commitment more robust on the region.
Based on the recognition of the right to collective self-defense made possible by Prime Minister Abe in 2015 as well as the goal of defense spending reaching 2% of GDP announced by Prime Minister Kishida in 2022, Japan will make its fair share of contributions to peace and stabllity over Taiwan Strait.
More than that, a Taiwan contingency is a matter of life and death for Japan. To keep the U.S., which has shown a bit of isolationist tendencies, anchored in Asia, it is necessary for Japan to share more U.S. responsibilities. Prime Minister Takaichi will revise the national security strategy and the national defense strategy in December 2026, one year earlier than scheduled. She will come up with more ambitious national security goals for that purpose.
Lastly, economic security dimension should be mentioned briefly here. From the normalization of Japan-China and U.S.-China relations until the end of the Cold War, China served as a strategic partner in countering the Soviet Union. And the Western nations fully deployed their supply chains into China during the post-Cold War era when free trade was strongly praised.
However, as China pivots toward Russia and the risk of a Taiwan contingency becomes increasingly real, a reassessment of economic ties with China is underway. Efforts to prevent the leakage of sensitive technologies to China and recognize the risks of excessive dependence on China are advancing.
References
1. U.S.-China Shanghai Communiqué, Item 12 (February 28, 1972)
12. The U.S. side declared: The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position. It reaffirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves. The U.S. does not challenge this position. The U.S. interest lies in the peaceful resolution of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves.)
This statement was drafted by Dr. Kissinger and highly praised by Zhou Enlai. It merely acknowledges the fact that both China and Taiwan assert that China is one. Reading between the lines, it actually states that there are two Chinas: the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China, and that a military solution to the Taiwan issue is unacceptable. Compared to the Japan-China Joint Declaration, the U.S. position is more strongly expressed here.
2. Article 3 of the Japan-China Joint Declaration (September 29, 1972)
"The Government of the People's Republic of China reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully understands and respects this position of the Government of the People's Republic of China and upholds its position based on Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration.
3. Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration (1945) states; VIII. The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out, and the sovereignty of Japan shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and the minor islands as we may determine.
4. Cairo Declaration (1943) states; The purpose of the Allied Powers is [...] to restore to the Republic of China all territories stolen by Japan from the Chinese people, such as Manchuria, Taiwan, and the Penghu Islands."
5. Article 2(b) of the Treaty of San Francisco (1952) states; Japan renounces all rights, titles and claims to Taiwan and the Penghu Islands. Therefore, Japan maintains a position that it is the Allied powers to decide who could claim Taiwan. In practice, Chiang Kai-shek of the Republic of China entered the city of Taipei.
6. Article 6 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty (1960)
"For the purpose of contributing to the security of Japan and to the maintenance of international peace and security in the Far East, the United States of America shall be permitted to use facilities and areas in Japan for its Army, Air Force, and Navy."
During the cold war, Japan's Self-Defense Forces focused entirely on deterring the Soviet Union in Hokkaido, so that the U.S. military defends Japan's surrounding regions (the "Far East" in the treaty text refers to Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines) using U.S. military bases in Japan. The U.S. has concluded mutual defense treaties individually with South Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines. However, the U.S.-China (Republic of China) alliance dissolved in 1972. The U.S. Congress enacted the Taiwan Relations Act, committing to Taiwan's defense.
7. Evolution of Japan's Threat Perception and Defense System Enhancement
The Soviet Union dissolved (1991). Japan’s strategic focus shifted to the Korean Peninsula due to North Korea's nuclear crisis. The Law Concerning Measures for Situations in the Vicinity of Japan (1999) was made under PM Obuchi.
Entering the 21st century, national security focus shifted to Taiwan, because of Chinese very rapid military build-up. The Peace and Security Legislation (2015. Permitting the exercise of the right to collective self-defense) was made under PM Abe.
|
Statistical Data and Analysis (as of November 28)
Rapid deterioration of Japan–China relations is occurring.
On November 7, Japan’s Prime Minister Takaichi stated in the Diet that “a Taiwan contingency could constitute a survival-threatening situation.” In response, China's Consul General in Osaka posted on social media, “I'll cut off your filthy head.” China asserted that the remarks violated the so-called “One China” principle, demanded their retraction, and hinted at retaliation by referring to the Mukden Incident and the postwar international order. Since November 28, China has rolled out countermeasures against the Prime Minister's remarks, including urging its citizens to refrain from travel, tourism, and study in Japan; halting imports of Japanese seafood; postponing the Japan-China-Korea cultural ministers' meeting; and refusing to hold a Japan-China-Korea summit. China also criticized the Prime Minister’s remarks in statements at the UN General Assembly and in a letter to the UN Secretary-General. State-run media intensified personal attacks against the Prime Minister, and there were moves to question Japan’s sovereignty over Okinawa.
In response, Japan repeatedly explained that the Prime Minister’s remarks did not alter the government’s longstanding position. It has been working to counter China's claims and communicate its stance, including by sending a letter to the UN Secretary-General explaining Japan's position.
[Statistical Data as of November 28]
Japan Coast Guard (JCG) daily updates the statistical data on the number of China Coast Guard vessels entering in the contiguous zone around the Senkaku Islands and intruding into Japanese territorial waters. The below is from the website of JCG.
https://www.kaiho.mlit.go.jp/
mission/senkaku/senkaku.html
Nov. |
Contiguous zone |
Territorial
Waters |
Nov. |
Contiguous zone |
Territorial
Waters |
14 |
|
|
21 |
4 |
|
15 |
4 |
|
22 |
4 |
|
16 |
4 |
4 |
23 |
4 |
|
17 |
4 |
|
24 |
4 |
|
18 |
1 |
|
25 |
4 |
|
19 |
4 |
|
26 |
4 |
|
20 |
4 |
|
27 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Topics |
11/7 |
On November 7, during the Lower House Budget Committee meeting, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi was asked to give concrete examples of situations in which Japan could exercise the right of collective self-defense in the event of a Taiwan contingency. She responded, ‘If it involves the use of warships and includes the use of force, then no matter how you look at it, I believe it could constitute a “survival-threatening situation.” Past prime ministers had avoided stating their views explicitly, and this is the first time one has clearly acknowledged the possibility that a Taiwan contingency could constitute a survival-threatening situation.
Takaichi’s remarks suggested that, depending on the circumstances, the Japan Self-Defense Forces could join the U.S. military in the use of force in the event of a Taiwan contingency. Ms. Takaichi stated that ‘judgments must be made based on the specific circumstances of any actual situation, taking all available information into account.’ She also argued that if Chinese forces were to impose a naval blockade on Taiwan with warships and the U.S. military came to intervene, ‘the use of force against the U.S. by Chinese forces could also be anticipated in order to prevent that.’ ‘Simply lining up civilian ships to obstruct passage does not constitute a survival-threatening situation. However, if it involves an actual naval blockade during wartime, with drones flying and various other situations arising, it could be viewed differently.’ She added that ‘if a military attack occurs, it is highly likely to constitute a survival-threatening situation.’
Meanwhile, the prime minister stated, ‘Our consistent position is to hope for a peaceful resolution to issues concerning Taiwan through dialogue.’ She added, ‘We must prepare for the worst-case scenario. This does not mean that Japan would immediately recognize it as a survival-threatening situation and take military action.’ |
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/9 |
On November 8, Xue Jian, the Chinese Consul General in Osaka, posted on social media in response to Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks on a Taiwan contingency: “That filthy neck that dared to butt in will be severed without a moment's hesitation. Are you prepared for that?”
On November 9, he posted, “‘A Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency’ is the path of death chosen by some foolish Japanese politicians. It is a reckless move that ignores Japan’s obligations as a defeated country and the former-enemy provisions of the UN Charter.” He added, “Regain at least a minimum of reason and respect for the law, so that you do not again face a catastrophic defeat that could destroy your people.” |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/10 |
On November 10, Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara revealed that, regarding Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks on a Taiwan contingency, Japan lodged a strong protest through diplomatic channels after the Chinese Consul General stationed in Osaka posted inappropriate content on social media. This post has drawn critical comments on social media. This consul general has frequently posted controversial content on social media. Regarding this, the government strongly protested to China and demanded the immediate removal of the posts, some of which are now inaccessible.
|
|
11/10 |
On November 10, Japan's Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae has said her remark last week about a Taiwan contingency does not change the government's existing position. She was speaking at a Lower House Budget Committee session.
Takaichi said she made the remark assuming a worst-case scenario when she was asked about what would be considered a Taiwan contingency. She clarified that the government will judge what kind of situation would be "survival-threatening" by comprehensively considering all the information on an actual specific case. The prime minister said her remark is in line with the government's position and she will not retract it. Takaichi added she will refrain from commenting on specific cases from now on. She said she has no intention to make her remark a unified government view. |
|
11/10 |
On November 10, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson expressed “strong dissatisfaction” with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on a Taiwan contingency, revealing that China had lodged a protest with Japan. He condemned the remarks as “a crude interference in China’s internal affairs.”
A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson stated that Takaichi’s remarks violated the “one-China” principle and were “inconsistent with the Japanese government’s past political commitments.” He also referred to her meeting with the Taiwanese representative at the APEC summit. He noted that “Japan has recently made negative statements and taken negative actions regarding the Taiwan issue,” and urged Japan “not to provoke China or send wrong signals to Taiwan independence forces.” Regarding the Chinese Consul General in Osaka criticizing Takaichi's Diet remarks on social media, he defended it as “a response to dangerous rhetoric.” |
Jiji Press News (Japanese) |
|
11/11 |
On November 11, Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara said Japan had explained the intent of the remarks and the government’s position. He stressed that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are vital not only for Japan’s security but also for the stability of the international community. Japan’s stance—calling for a peaceful resolution through dialogue and adhering to the 1972 Japan–China Joint Communiqué—remains unchanged. He also said the recent Japan–China summit reaffirmed efforts to advance the strategic, mutually beneficial relationship and that communication must be strengthened to reduce friction and deepen mutual understanding and cooperation. |
|
11/12 |
On November 11, the Chinese Embassy in Japan posted on social media about Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks on a Taiwan contingency, condemning Japan by saying, “Japanese militarism has repeatedly launched external invasions under the pretext of survival-threatening.” It also warned that interfering in China’s reunification with Taiwan “may only cause self-inflicted harm and lead to consequences of one’s own making.”
The embassy stressed that the remarks amounted to “gross interference in China's internal affairs and a serious challenge to its core interests.” Referring to the 1931 Liutiaohu Incident that triggered the Manchurian Incident, it added, “We cannot help but suspect that Japan is attempting to repeat the same mistake.” |
Jiji Press News (Japanese) |
|
11/13 |
On November 12, at a press conference, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson strongly criticized Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's refusal to retract her Diet remarks on a Taiwan contingency, saying they were “a crude interference in China’s internal affairs and a challenge to China’s core interests. We will never tolerate them.” He said, “Japan must immediately correct its mistake and retract its malicious remarks. Otherwise, Japan will bear full responsibility for all consequences.” He also warned, “If Japan uses military force in the Taiwan Strait, it will constitute an act of aggression. China will certainly strike back.”
Prime Minister Takaichi has indicated that she will not retract her comments, saying they “do not change the government’s traditional stance.” This is the first time China has publicly demanded a retraction following a Diet statement. |
|
11/14 |
On November 13, in response to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s Diet remarks about a Taiwan contingency, China’s Vice Foreign Minister summoned Japan's ambassador to China to lodge a “stern démarche and strong protest,” demanding that the remarks be retracted. He criticized Japan, saying, “The 1.4 billion Chinese people will never tolerate this.” He also stated that the Taiwan issue is “a red line that must not be crossed,” and used unusually strong language, saying, “Any attempt to interfere in the great cause of China’s reunification will be met with a direct and severe blow.” He repeatedly demanded the retraction of the remarks and strongly warned that “if Japan continues on this erroneous path, it will bear full responsibility for all consequences.”
On November 14, Japan’s Vice Foreign Minister summoned China's ambassador to Japan over a social media post by China’s consul general in Osaka. He strongly urged the Chinese side to take “appropriate action.” |
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/14 |
In its edition dated November 14, the People’s Daily asserted that Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks “violate the one-China principle and openly challenge the international order established after World War II.” It further accused her of “attempting to overturn assessments of Japan’s history of aggression and revive militarism.” |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/14 |
On November 14, China's Defense Ministry spokesperson stated that Takaichi's remarks “send a gravely mistaken signal to Taiwan independence forces and are extremely dangerous.” The spokesperson issued a statement warning that if Japan were to use military force regarding the Taiwan issue, it “would certainly be struck in the head and left bloodied by the Chinese military” and would “pay a tragic price,” condemning Takaichi’s comments on a Taiwan contingency.
|
Jiji Press News (Japanese) |
|
11/14 |
On November 14, Japan’s chief cabinet secretary Kihara stated, “Peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are vital not only for Japan’s security but also for the stability of the international community. It is Japan’s consistent position to hope that issues concerning Taiwan will be resolved peacefully through dialogue. The government's stance on Taiwan remains unchanged as set out in the 1972 Japan–China Joint Communiqué, and we will continue to strongly urge the Chinese side to respond appropriately.”
Regarding China’s intentions this time, Professor Makoto Kawashima of the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School, who studies Chinese political and diplomatic history, analyzed: “China is clearly attempting to create an atmosphere where it can claim to the world that Japan is trying to change the status quo, thereby justifying its own actions to alter the situation if Japan does so.” He further pointed out, “If Japan does not respond firmly to China's various propaganda campaigns, there is a risk that China's narrative could spread globally.”
Regarding future Japan-China relations, he stated: “Japan will need to clearly convey to the China that its position remains ‘unchanged from before,’ and continue dialogue while fulfilling its responsibility to explain this both at home and abroad. Even if China keeps its fist raised for a while, this is not a matter of Japan making concessions; we can only respond based on principles and facts.” |
|
11/14 |
The Japan Joint Staff released its monthly statistics on scrambles. In October, the Japan Air Self Defense Force (JASDF) conducted 71 scrambles. The most scrambles are against Russian aircrafts (43 times). The others were against Chinese aircrafts (25 times) and so on. |
|
11/14 |
On November 13, the special advisor to the prime minister of Japan received a courtesy call from the permanent state secretary of Finland’s foreign ministry.
Recognizing that the security of the Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific is inseparable, the two sides exchanged views on cooperation in the field of security, and also discussed international situation. They concurred to continue exchanging views and strengthening coordination between the two countries. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/14 |
On November 14, through a spokesperson, South Korea’s foreign ministry strongly protested the opening of a new facility at Japan’s “National Museum of Territory and Sovereignty,” presenting Japan’s position on territories including Takeshima, and again demanded its closure. The statement reaffirmed South Korea’s claim to Takeshima, declared that Japan’s claims “serve no purpose in building a future-oriented Korea-Japan relationship,” and expressed “strong regret.” The ministry summoned Japan's deputy chief of mission in South Korea and lodged a protest. |
|
11/15 |
On November 14, China’s foreign ministry advised its citizens to refrain from traveling to Japan for the time being. Following Prime Minister Takaichi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency, the ministry asserted that “serious risks to the safety of Chinese nationals have arisen.” This is seen as a de facto retaliatory measure. China’s Foreign Ministry issued a notice stating, “Since the beginning of this year, Japan's public security has been unstable, with a surge in crimes targeting Chinese nationals,” without providing evidence. It also urged caution among Chinese citizens residing in Japan.
|
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/16 |
On November 16, China's Ministry of Education claimed without providing evidence that crimes against Chinese nationals are rampant in Japan. It advised Chinese students to carefully consider studying in Japan, citing deteriorating public safety. This was a countermeasure to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's Diet response regarding a Taiwan contingency.
|
|
11/16 |
On November 16, China's Ministry of Culture and Tourism urged Chinese citizens to avoid travel to Japan. It called for caution regarding Japan's public security situation. This appears to be part of countermeasures following Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks concerning a Taiwan contingency. It seems aimed at damaging Japan's tourism industry and other sectors. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/16 |
On November 16, the Japan Joint Staff announced that the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) conducted joint training with the U.S. Navy, the Philippine Navy, and the Philippine Coast Guard on November 14 in the South China Sea as part of “Maritime Cooperative Activity.” The JMSDF participated with the destroyer Akebono and one patrol helicopter. They conducted exercises such as anti-submarine warfare drills, communications checks, and replenishment at sea alongside a U.S. aircraft carrier and Philippine frigates. As China seeks to unilaterally advance into the South China Sea, the Philippines is strengthening its defense cooperation with friendly countries. |
|
11/16 |
On November 16, four Chinese coast guard vessels sailed in Japanese waters off the Senkaku Islands in Okinawa Prefecture, the JCG said. The incident marked the first entry by any Chinese official vessel since Oct. 15. According to the JCG, the vessels entered Japanese waters around the Senkaku Islands for about one and a half hours. |
|
11/16 |
On November 16, the China Coast Guard announced that it conducted patrols in the waters surrounding the Senkaku Islands. It does not disclose all of its activities around the Senkaku Islands. The Chinese government is currently intensifying its opposition to Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remark in the Diet that “a contingency involving Taiwan could constitute a Survival-Threatening Situation.” The announcement of the patrol at this timing is believed to signal China’s intent to increase pressure on Japan, both domestically and internationally.
On its official social media accounts, the China Coast Guard announced that it had patrolled the territorial waters of the “Diaoyu Islands,” the Chinese name for the Senkaku Islands. It claimed this was “a legitimate exercise of rights in accordance with the law.” However, it made no mention of Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks themselves. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/17 |
On November 17, according to the JCG, three of four China Coast Guard vessels navigating in the contiguous zone outside Japan's territorial waters near the Senkaku Islands had left, reportedly due to forecasted rough weather. The reason why only one vessel remained is unclear, but amid rising Japan-China tensions, China may have been conscious of maintaining a continuous navigation record. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/17 |
The South Korean Navy informed Japan that it would not hold this month’s planned joint search and rescue exercise, which had been coordinated with the JMSDF. Since the suspension of refueling support for South Korean Air Force aircraft, defense exchanges have continued to be postponed, but both governments hope to calm the situation so that it does not affect Japan–South Korea relations.
The joint exercises, held ten times from 1999 to 2017. They were suspended after a 2018 incident in which a South Korean destroyer targeted a JMSDF patrol aircraft with its fire-control radar. The resumption of the joint exercises had been regarded as a “symbol of strengthened cooperation.” This month’s postponement appears to be linked to Japan’s cancellation of planned refueling support for South Korean Air Force aircraft after some were found flying near Takeshima.
The South Korean military band also declined to participate in the “JSDF Music Festival” from November 13 to 15. A JSDF official speculated that the South Korean military’s actions reflected sensitivity to domestic public opinion. On November 14, Japan's defense minister said, “We want to continue our cooperation and exchanges.” A South Korean official expressed expectations for the situation to calm down.
Behind both countries’ efforts to maintain relations lies the worsening security environment in the region. Senior Japanese defense officials say the joint exercise is expected to be rescheduled, emphasizing that “it is important to continue communication while allowing for a cooling-off period.” |
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/17 |
On November 15, the Japan Joint Staff confirmed one Chinese UAV (estimated) flying from the East China Sea to the Pacific Ocean through the area between Yonagunijima Island and Taiwan. This UAV circled on the Pacific Ocean, and turned and flew back to the East China Sea through the same area. The JASDF scrambled to this UAV. |
|
11/17 |
On November 17, Japan-Indonesia defense ministers’ meeting was held.
The two sides held concrete discussions on the security environment surrounding both countries and the future direction of defense cooperation and coordination, including various possibilities for the future. In addition to bilateral cooperation, they confirmed that they would continue discussions on strengthening ministerial-level coordination in multilateral settings centered on Japan and Indonesia. |
Ministry of Defense of Japan |
|
11/17 |
On November 17, Japan-Indonesia foreign and defense ministers’ meeting ("2+2") was held.
Japan's foreign minister stated that strengthening the realization of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP)” has become increasingly important and that security cooperation between Japan and Indonesia, both democratic maritime nations, is of great significance. The four ministers shared concern about the increasingly severe international security situation. They discussed bilateral security and defense cooperation, regional issues, and collaboration in the international arena, and confirmed their commitment to further reinforcing the cooperation between the two countries to maintain and strengthen a free and open international order based on the rule of law.
The four ministers welcomed the progress of cooperation in maritime security, including the provision of high-speed patrol boats through OSA (Official Security Assistance). They shared the view that the two countries would further expand the cooperation in this field including through OSA. Also, they concurred on further advancing the discussion between the defense authorities of the two countries.
Regarding the situation in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, Japan's foreign and defense ministers expressed serious concern about the continuation and the intensification of the unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force or coercion. Furthermore, the four ministers confirmed the importance of adhering to international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), from the perspective of upholding a maritime order based on the rule of law. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/17 |
On November 17, Japan-Indonesia foreign ministers’ working dinner was held.
The two ministers concurred on strengthening the Japan–Indonesia comprehensive and strategic partnership by promoting further cooperation. Regarding regional and international affairs, Japan's foreign minister noted that a free and open international order based on the rule of law is under challenge in various parts of the world, and that it is increasingly important to promote a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP). They affirmed the importance of collaboration in addressing regional and international issues. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/18 |
On November 18, Japan's prime minister received a courtesy call from Indonesia's foreign and defense ministers.
Japan's prime minister emphasized that strengthening Japan’s relations with Indonesia is important for promoting the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) as well as maintaining and strengthening a free and open international order based on the rule of law. She also expressed her desire to advance cooperation in a wide range of fields, including security and defense cooperation. Both sides
agreed to further strengthen their comprehensive strategic partnership. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/18 |
On November 18, at a press conference, Japan’s minister for Territorial Issues rebutted South Korea’s protest over a new facility at Japan’s “National Museum of Territory and Sovereignty.” The facility introduces the Japanese government's position on Takeshima in Shimane Prefecture and other territories. He stated, “Takeshima is clearly Japan's inherent territory under international law. We will continue to use the museum as a base to strengthen our outreach both domestically and internationally.”
|
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/18 |
On November 17, Japan’s deputy chief cabinet secretary and the special advisor to the prime minister received a courtesy call from a NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NATO PA) delegation. The Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary provided explanations on global security challenges in light of the current regional situation, Japan’s security policy, and efforts to further strengthen Japan–NATO relations. This was followed by an exchange of views.
On November 18, a delegation from the NATO PA visited Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Japan’s State Minister for Foreign Affairs explained that, as the inseparability of Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific security has become a shared understanding among like-minded countries, further developing Japan–NATO relations and NATO–IP4 (Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea) relations is strategically important. This was followed by an exchange of views on the global security environment and Japan–NATO relations.
On November 18, a delegation from the NATO PA visited Japan’s Ministry of Defense. Ministry of Defense officials briefed the delegation on Japan’s security environment, security and defense policies, and defense equipment and technology cooperation. This was followed by an exchange of views. Japan’s defense minister emphasized that, as security in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions becomes increasingly inseparable, strengthening cooperation between Japan and NATO, NATO and IP4 (Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea), as well as between Japan and individual NATO member states, is more important than ever. He expressed Japan’s commitment to advancing bilateral and multilateral collaboration. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (Japanese) |
Ministry of Defense of Japan |
|
11/18 |
On November 18, the diplomatic authorities of Japan and China held director-general–level talks to discuss the rapidly cooling bilateral relationship following Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency. It was the first face-to-face meeting between senior officials of the two governments since the prime minister’s remarks. The Japanese side stated that Japan's position remains unchanged from the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué, which recognized China as the “sole legitimate government,” and that the prime minister's remarks did not alter its established stance. The Chinese side asserted that the remarks “violate the ‘One China’ principle and fundamentally undermine the political foundation of Japan-China relations,” demanding their retraction. |
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/18 |
At the director-general talks held in Beijing on November 18, a video clip showing Japan’s director general appearing to bow to his Chinese counterpart was released by China's state-run CCTV (online edition). It is spreading on Chinese social media. Regarding Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks on a Taiwan contingency, this appears to be part of propaganda aimed at highlighting China's superiority.
When the two officials paused in the lobby, the Japanese director general listened to the Chinese director general speaking with his hands in his pockets. Because the Japanese director general leaned toward the interpreter standing beside him, it appears as though he was bowing. |
Jiji Press News (Japanese) |
|
11/19 |
Regarding the director-general-level talks between Japan and China held on November 18, Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara expressed displeasure on November 19, stating that “press arrangements (including photo opportunities) were made without proper coordination with the Japanese side,” and revealed that a protest had been lodged with the Chinese government. |
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/19 |
On November 18, China's ambassador to the United Nations sharply criticized Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency during a UN General Assembly meeting on Security Council reform. China asserted that such statements interfere in its internal affairs and undermine the postwar international order. He further stated that “Japan is entirely unqualified to seek a permanent seat on the Security Council,” intensifying pressure on Japan even in the international forum. Japan's representative exercised the right of reply, countering, “This is a baseless statement. Since the end of World War II, Japan has consistently walked the path of a peace-loving nation,” sparking a heated exchange of accusations.
|
|
11/19 |
On November 19, China's spy-hunting agency, the Ministry of State Security, issued a statement via its official social media account condemning Prime Minister Takagi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency. Referring to its record of detaining Japanese nationals on espionage charges, it asserted, “We will resolutely crush any attempt to split the nation.” Observers suggest this aims to pressure Japan by hinting at the possibility of detaining Japanese citizens. |
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/19 |
The Chinese government has effectively halted imports of Japanese seafood products, Japanese officials revealed on November 19. China reportedly notified the Japanese government that inspections regarding treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant were insufficient. This appears to be part of countermeasures in response to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency. On the same day, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson claimed, “Japan has yet to provide the technical materials it promised.” The spokesperson also renewed the demand that the prime minister retract her remarks and hinted at the possibility of further countermeasures. |
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/19 |
Amid China's intensifying criticism of Japan over Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks concerning a Taiwan contingency, Japanese internet users have gained attention for responding with irony and satire. While China appears to be aiming to unsettle the Japanese public through information warfare, these netizens have effectively neutralized the criticism by turning China's wolf warrior diplomacy into a laughingstock.
On November 15, China's Foreign Ministry claimed in a social media post that provoking China would mean “having your head smashed and bleeding before the iron Great Wall built with the flesh and blood of over 1.4 billion Chinese people.” Japanese netizens reacted, saying things like, “This Japanese phrasing implies the Chinese people who end up bloodied.”
On November 14, China’s military also warned that if Japan intervened in a Taiwan contingency, it would “surely be crushed to pieces before the iron wall of the People's Liberation Army.” Many netizens pointed out the misuse of the Japanese expression, noting that it actually has a positive meaning: ‘to devote one’s utmost effort’ or ‘to strive with dedication.’
When issuing criticism against Japan, China’s foreign ministry and the Chinese military use a distinctive template featuring white or orange text on red, black, or blue backgrounds. A website that lets users create parody images based on this template has now appeared online. Currently, posting images featuring new comments or illustrations using this template is gaining momentum among Japanese netizens. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/20 |
The Global Times, affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party's People's Daily, ran an editorial on November 19 asserting that “historical and legal debates have always existed over the sovereignty of the Ryukyu Islands.” It asserted that China treated the Ryukyu Islands generously during the Ming Dynasty. In contrast, it criticized Japan for “forcibly abolishing the Ryukyu Kingdom through military threats and annexing it.” China has strongly opposed Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency, and it appears to be using Okinawa Prefecture as a card against Japan to exert pressure.
|
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/20 |
On November 20, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce strongly criticized Prime Minister Takaichi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency, stating, “If Japan continues down the wrong path, we will resolutely take necessary measures.” The spokesperson indicated that if the remarks are not retracted, China will take further action. |
|
11/20 |
On November 20, a South Korean government official revealed that China had informed them of the postponement of the trilateral cultural ministers' meeting between Japan, China, and South Korea scheduled for the 24th of this month. On the same day, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry stated that Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks regarding Taiwan had “undermined the foundation and atmosphere for trilateral cooperation. The conditions for holding the meeting are not currently in place.”
|
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/20 |
On November 19, China’s state-run news agency Xinhua published an online article titled, “How Did Takaichi ‘Poisonous Seedling’ Grow?” —a play on Takaichi's name. The piece intensified personal attacks by linking Takaichi's past visits to Yasukuni Shrine and her historical views on World War II. A satirical illustration was posted on social media showing a figure resembling Ms. Takaichi in military uniform reflected in a mirror. The post targets Ms. Takaichi and “right-wing forces” for criticism, waging a public opinion campaign.
|
|
11/21 |
On November 21, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated regarding China's intensifying opposition to her remarks concerning a Taiwan contingency: “Regarding China, the direction agreed upon at the leaders’ meeting at the end of last month remains completely unchanged.” She added, “As for explanations concerning “survival-threatening situation,” the government has repeatedly stated its position, which remains consistent.” |
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/22 |
On November 22, Japan-UK Summit meeting was held.
Japan’s prime minister stated that both as G7 partners and key allies of the United States, with a view to realizing a ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’ and maintaining and strengthening an international order based on the rule of law. The two leaders concurred to continue advancing concrete Japan-UK security cooperation. They exchanged views on the international situations such as East Asia. They concurred that they should continue to coordinate their efforts on various issues in the international community. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/22 |
The Chinese government, intensifying its opposition to Prime Minister Takaichi's remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency, has claimed that incidents targeting Chinese nationals in Japan are increasing and has urged its citizens to refrain from traveling there. In response, on November 21, Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs released the number of actual cases in Japan in which Chinese nationals were victims of crimes such as murder and robbery, and denied the claim, stating, “The assertion that such incidents are occurring frequently is inaccurate.”
|
|
11/22 |
Regarding the trilateral summit with China and South Korea, Japan, as the chair country, proposed holding the meeting in January next year, but China conveyed through diplomatic channels that it could not agree to a summit because ‘the Prime Minister is not responding appropriately,’ and rejected the proposal. China has hardened its stance in reaction to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks concerning a Taiwan contingency. Multiple diplomatic sources revealed this on November 22.
|
|
11/22 |
On November 21, China’s ambassador to the United Nations sent a letter to UN
Secretary-General calling for the retraction of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s Diet remarks concerning a Taiwan contingency. The
letter condemned the prime minister's remarks, asserting it “constituted the first instance of threatening China with military force and openly challenging China's core interests.” The remarks violated international law, it asserted, adding that it “seriously undermined the post-war international order and openly provoked the Chinese people of over 1.4 billion and the people of Asian countries that suffered Japanese aggression.” It further claimed that despite repeated protests from China, Japan “has shown no sign of reflection and refuses to retract the erroneous remarks.”
The Chinese mission to the United Nations explained that the letter would be distributed to all member states as an official UN General Assembly document. Pressure on the prime minister is also mounting within the international community. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/23 |
On November 23, Japan-Germany Summit meeting was held.
Japan’s prime minister stated that the security of the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific are inseparable, and that she hopes to work with Chancellor Merz to achieve a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific." The two leaders concurred on strengthening cooperation in national and economic security between Japan and Germany. They also exchanged views on international situation, including the Indo-Pacific, and concurred that Japan and Germany will work closely together to address the challenges facing the international community. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/23 |
On November 23, Japan’s prime minister held talk with France's president.
Japan’s prime minister emphasized the importance of advancing Japan-France cooperation amid challenging the international circumstances. Recognizing that security of Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic is inseparable, the two leaders concurred that Japan and France, as ‘Exceptional Partner’ sharing common values and principles, would continue to cooperate closely across all fields, such as security. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/23 |
On November 23, Japan-India Summit meeting was held.
Japan’s prime minister stated that she is determined to achieve tangible results across a wide range of fields including security and defense. The two leaders also concurred to cooperate in realizing a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific." |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/23 |
On November 23, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs countered via social media that the “enemy state clause” had been rendered obsolete at the 1995 UN General Assembly, in response to the Chinese Embassy in Japan stating on November 21 that it had the right to take military action against Japan and other defeated nations of World War II under the UN Charter’s “enemy state clauses.” “China also cast a vote in favor,” the ministry emphasized. It criticized the statement, saying, “The claim that a defunct provision remains valid contradicts the judgment already made at the United Nations.” |
Yomiuri Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/24 |
Posts stating “A Ryukyu contingency is a China contingency” are spreading on Chinese social media. This is a sarcastic reference to “A Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” and has spread as rumors questioning Okinawa’s affiliation with Japan. The posts exploit the fact that the Potsdam Declaration left the status of the Ryukyu Islands unspecified, aiming to give the impression that China could have a role in Okinawa’s sovereignty.
|
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/25 |
On November 24, the Japan Joint Staff confirmed one Chinese UAV (estimated) flying from the East China Sea to the Pacific Ocean through the area between Yonagunijima Island and Taiwan. This UAV flew back to the East China Sea through the same area. The JASDF scrambled to this UAV. |
|
11/25 |
On November 25, Japan-U.S. Summit telephone talk was held.
The two leaders exchanged views on strengthening the Japan-U.S. Alliance and the situation and various challenges facing the Indo-Pacific region. They affirmed that the two countries will continue working closely under the current international situation. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/25 |
On November 25, Japan's foreign minister received a courtesy call from the secretary-general of the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
Japan’s foreign minister stated that Japan attaches great importance to maintenance and development of the maritime order based on the rule of law. The secretary-general expressed her gratitude for Japan's contributions and her hope for Japan's continued active engagement in ISA’s activities. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/25 |
On November 25, regarding Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on a Taiwan contingency, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary stated that “a letter explaining Japan’s position has been sent from our UN ambassador to the UN Secretary-General.” At a press conference, he emphasized that “China’s claims, which are contrary to the facts, are unacceptable, and the Japanese government must firmly respond and communicate its position.”
|
Asahi Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
11/27 |
On November 27, Japan's foreign minister met with Mongolia's deputy prime minister.
The minister expressed his desire to advance bilateral cooperation and to work with Mongolia in addressing global issues to realize a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific.” The deputy prime minister conveyed his willingness to further deepen relations with Japan. The two sides exchanged views on cooperation in regional and international fora. |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan |
|
11/27 |
On November 26, the Chinese Embassy in Japan again urged people to avoid traveling to Japan and warned those already there to be cautious via social media. It stated that since July, cases of Chinese nationals facing discrimination and seeking assistance in Japan have “clearly increased, with November being particularly notable.” The Japanese government denies China's claim that public safety in Japan has deteriorated. |
|
11/27 |
On November 27, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary denied a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report that U.S. President Trump had advised Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi not to provoke China over the Taiwan issue, stating, “There is no such fact.” He added that Japan had lodged a protest with the WSJ. The WSJ also reported that while President Trump “suggested” she “tone down her remarks on Taiwan,” he did not ask her to retract her remarks on a Taiwan contingency out of consideration for Japan’s domestic politics. The chief cabinet secretary did not address these factual points.
|
Jiji Press News (Japanese) |
|
11/27 |
In a November 27 international commentary, the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper, again criticized Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on a Taiwan contingency as “a challenge to the postwar international order.” It stated that both China and the United States made tremendous sacrifices to win World War II and called on the United States to help prevent “attempts to revive militarism.”
|
|
11/27 |
Regarding Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s decision not to state in the Diet on November 26 that a Taiwan contingency could constitute a “survival-threatening situation,” a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on November 27 that “not mentioning it again and retracting erroneous remarks are entirely different matters.” The spokesperson criticized the move as “self-deception” and added that “China will never accept this,” maintaining that Prime Minister Takaichi must retract her remarks. |
Sankei Shimbun News (Japanese) |
|
|
|
|
