MENU
閉じる

East Asian
Maritime Security

HOME> East Asian Maritime Security> Monthly Column> Escalating Naval Tensions between the Philippines and China

Escalating Naval Tensions between the Philippines and China

Grey-Zone Pressure and Naval Asymmetry

The Philippines faces sustained pressure in the South China Sea, where confrontations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have intensified around Second Thomas Shoal and Scarborough Shoal. For decades, Beijing has relied on “grey-zone” tactics to assert control, employing coast guard and maritime militia vessels to block, ram, or harass Philippine resupply missions. Water cannons, close maneuvers, and new unilateral restrictions of Philippines fishing and replenishment rights have become routine, allowing China to advance its claims without triggering direct military escalation. Over time, this persistent coercion risks undermining Philippine sovereignty and operational freedom within its exclusive economic zone.

The asymmetry in naval and coast guard capacity compounds these pressures. The PLA Navy, with a third aircraft carrier launched and a new one under construction, has grown into the world’s largest in terms of numbers, supported by the heavily armed China Coast Guard and a broad network of maritime militia. This layered force structure ensures a constant Chinese presence in disputed waters and provides Beijing with escalation dominance. Manila, by contrast, continues to modernize from a low base. The introduction of two Jose Rizal–class frigates, new patrol vessels, and improved coast guard assets marks progress, but these remain modest compared to China’s scale and capabilities. The imbalance constrains the Philippines’ ability to resist pressure independently and shapes the broader perception of vulnerability.

Alliance Responses and U.S. Presence

China’s assertiveness has been reinforced by doubts about U.S. strategic implication. With Washington managing crises elsewhere, including inside its own society, and looking increasingly inward, Beijing may judge that American attention is divided, creating opportunities to test alliance commitments. Such perceptions carry risks for Manila and Beijing also : coercive tactics may gradually shift realities on the ground, leaving Manila unable to maintain control even without outright conflict but also provoking a strong response from the United States.

The U.S.–Philippines alliance has been revitalized through the expansion of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (2023). Four additional bases—among them facilities in northern Luzon near the Bashi Channel and in Palawan—now provide expanded access for U.S. forces. These sites improve intelligence, surveillance, logistics, and rapid deployment options, strengthening deterrence and complicating Chinese planning. They also signal a more durable American commitment to Philippine defense at a time of heightened uncertainty.

Japan’s Growing Role

Japan has also emerged as a significant partner. Tokyo has supplied patrol vessels and coastal radar systems, and in 2023 extended its new Official Security Assistance (OSA) program to Manila. The Reciprocal Access Agreement was signed in august 2025. It facilitates operational interoperability and joint exercises. Beyond bilateral ties, trilateral cooperation among the Philippines, the United States, and Japan has accelerated, embedding Manila within a wider framework of regional security and reinforcing deterrence in contested waters. On September 14, 2025, the Philippines, United States, and Japan have completed another round of joint maritime drills in the South China sea, reaffirming defense cooperation.

China’s Vulnerabilities

China itself faces internal challenges. Reports of corruption within the PLA and operational mishaps—including the collision of two Chinese vessels during a confrontation in August—highlight weaknesses beneath the surface of its growing fleet. Moreover, sustained grey-zone pressure generates reputational costs to China perceived as overly aggressive by its neighbours and beyond. By documenting and publicizing incidents and consistently invoking international law, notably the 2016 arbitral ruling, the Philippines has been able to frame China as a destabilizing actor, reinforcing diplomatic support from partners and international audiences.